fat amy aircraft

Fat Amy Aircraft - In 2015, reports emerged of a series of dogfight tests between America's newest stealth fighter, the F-35, and America's flagship fourth-generation platform, the F-16 Fighting Falcon. It was very bad. Reportedly, F-35

It loses scrap after scrap between the two jets to its predecessor. But as we have since learned, the report lacked significant context. And the F-35 is far from the slouch it was made out to be.

Fat Amy Aircraft

Today, fighter pilots often ignore the importance of things like air combat maneuvers (dog fighting tactics) when asked about them, opting instead for access to sophisticated sensors and effective long-range air-to-air weapons. .

Nr Npasew Hi Res Stock Photography And Images

In the real cockpit immediately. But make no mistake, modern fighters have to win battles in the air...and the truth is, most pilots heading into that war would choose the F-35.

Systems like the F-35 rely heavily on the common knowledge that dogfighting is a thing of the past, valuing data connectivity and paying little attention to hot rod performance. In fact, the F-35B and C, which are specialized for ship and amphibious assault carrier operations, are limited to maximum short bursts of 60 seconds or less to protect the delicate radar-absorbing coating on the fuselage. Meanwhile, Cold War-era speedsters like the F-16 can hit Mach 2 flying unarmed, and the supersonic F-15 can take a hit when needed. It operates well above Mach 2.5.

This change in tactics has led many to question how America's newest fighter jets will fare in a near-equal battle against more capable but larger fighters. Russia's fifth-generation Su-57 may not be very impressive, but the country's fourth-generation fighters, such as the high-performance Su-35, are impressive. Their thrusting aerobatics make for a more powerful show than the F-35's "talk quiet, carry a big stick" design, but what does that mean?

In 2015, David Ax over at War is Boring published details of a report showing how F-35s were repeatedly outgunned by F-16s. The exercise was reported to have taken place on January 14, 2015, at a naval test site in the Pacific Ocean near Edwards Air Force Base, California.

F 35 Variants

The battle took place between the new F-16D Block 40s and the Air Force's F-35As. The F-35A requires a full-length runway (unlike the STOVL and its portable siblings). The F-35A is also the only iteration of the Joint Strike Fighter's three iterations armed with the GAU-22/A 4-barrel 25 mm Gatling gun, and the close combat capability this exercise was intended to emulate. Good for dog fighting.

"The evaluation focused on the overall effectiveness of the aircraft in performing specific maneuvers in a changing environment," an unnamed F-35 test pilot wrote in the report. "This included routine fighter operations in attack, defense and neutral configurations at altitudes ranging from 10,000 to 30,000 feet."

The F-35 did not enter combat to maintain its stealth profile, so it did not carry external ammunition or fuel tanks, while the F-16

Equipped with an external tank. In Ax's report, he sees this as an advantage the F-35 is getting in testing, but it's actually an advantage the platform will accept.

This Is Why The Lockheed F 35 May Cost Over $1 Trillion

Once combat began, the F-35 appeared to struggle quickly, proving that its "light" performance made it impossible to line up the Viper in a fire-fighting attitude.

"Even with the F-16's limited targeting configuration, the F-35As remained at an exceptional disadvantage in each engagement," an unnamed test pilot reported after the exercise.

In both offensive and defensive matchups, the F-35 often came up short, mainly due to its inability to point its nose at the enemy.

A JSF pilot commented effectively on the F-35's slow nose, saying, "instead of pulling the Bandit back quickly and catching him off guard, the slow nose speed allowed for jink time before the gunner's solution." can be easily measured," he wrote. That standard left the F-16 difficult.

Lockheed Martin F 35

When the tide turned, the same nose-level problem plagued the F-35, allowing the F-16 to find a quick fire solution and joint strike fighters struggling to avoid the Viper's cannon path.

The only way the F-35 could beat the Viper was to launch into an extreme maneuver that gave the enemy a chance to turn its nose for a missile launch, the report suggests. But in doing so, it reportedly stole the F-35's airspeed, leaving it vulnerable to later attack.

"This approach required a commitment to lose energy, and it was a window of opportunity before needing to recover energy...and finally re-arm," the pilot wrote.

Ax reports and accompanying context seem to suggest that the F-35 is inferior to older aircraft. But it was only later

Vertical Aerospace And Heathrow Airport To Collaborate On Future Of Urban Air Mobility

F-35 Haters Loved The Report... But There Was Already Proof That Testing Isn't Everything

The report appears to confirm what many already believe about Lockheed Martin's new Joint Strike Fighter, giving the impression that the $1 trillion (plus) F-35 program will fall short of expectations. without a plane.

These particular tests failed to produce a worthy opponent...but that meant that subsequent reports and news did not seriously mislead the public about the F-35's true capabilities. It's not meant to be

The first indication that there was a problem came in the middle of the previous article. Ax explains how the F-35 could use that maneuver to turn its nose and fire missiles like the F-16 and only win. It seems they worked hard to get the F-35 to find its target, but the F-35 in particular

F 35 Vs. Typhoon... Fight!

In fact, the F-35 is known for being able to shoot "off-boresight."

It turns out that the abomination of the report about the F-35 was in no way based on the actual capabilities of the aircraft.

It was one of the earliest F-35s delivered to the Air Force, with program limitations specifically intended to prevent pilots from pushing the aircraft close to its structural limits. In fact, the rival F-16D had no such restrictions. But that's not all.

In a subsequent article written by Chris Osborne for the national interest, the reasons for the poor dogfight performance of the F-35 began to emerge.

Intercepted Podcast: American Mythology, Part Four

"The F-35 involved was an AF-2, which is an F-35 designed for flight science or flight quality testing. Most of the items are unequipped," the F-35 JPO office said in a statement.

So why couldn't the F-35 fire a missile aimed at the enemy F-16?

So? The answer is simple. The F-35s that participated in this exercise did not have all the necessary systems to take advantage of their unique capabilities.

AF-2 "did not have weapons or software that would allow the F-35 pilot to turn around, aim the weapon with his helmet, and fire at the enemy without directing the aircraft to the target."

Mig 29…the Most Beautiful Plane Ever Made In My Opinion. What Would Be Your Pick?

The AF-2 F-35s used in these dogfights also lacked the radar-absorbing coating necessary for the stealth profile of these jets. In fact, current radar absorbing materials (RAM) are rated to absorb over 70-80% of incoming electromagnetic (radar signal) energy, making it difficult for the F-16 to track the F-35 on radar. it is more difficult.

In other words, the F-35s that fought in these exercises were only flying at a percentage of their full capabilities in terms of aerobatics, targeting, and situational awareness.

If the F-35 and F-16 were on opposite sides of the collision and suddenly found themselves in front of each other, the fast moving Viper would have a chance to score with the F-35. , that's not right. saying that the F-16 is better. Anything can happen in war. Simple things like pilot error or approach position can give a super jet the advantage of being pushed...

In a combat situation, the F-35 is more likely to shoot down the F-16 in the field before the Viper pilot.

Why Is The F 35 Referred To As \

It's hard to win an air battle if your parachute opens before you realize the battle has begun.

Alex Hollings is an author, father, and Marine Corps veteran who specializes in foreign policy analysis and defense technology. She holds a master's degree in communications from Southern New Hampshire University and a bachelor's degree in corporate and organizational communications from Framingham State University.

To provide you with a better experience, we use technologies such as cookies to store and/or access device information. In accordance with these technologies,

Fat amy now, funko pop fat amy, fat amy, fat amy t shirts, fat amy costume, fat amy pop vinyl, fat amy shirt, fat amy weight loss, quotes from fat amy, fat amy pop, pitch perfect fat amy, fat amy loses weight